|
Quick Links
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
 |
 |
 |
|
Macro is better |
February 10, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
Sean Walling
from Goleta, CA United States
|
|
These should technically function the same as MACROline fittings but instead holding a smaller sized line. The only downside to this is the possibility of blowing the line when running guns at high pressures. Low pressure guns should have no troubles but the problems can occur since the walls of the microline tend to be thinner and less resilient. Also can be more prone to coming undone simply becuase of their smaller size. The weights of the macro vs micro fittings are nearly identical as is the line, so I say they aren't worth the change. If they were all that much better than macroline then you would see all the ego's, etc using them and people would change, but macro is most popular for a good reason, it works..
Was this review helpful to you? 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
|
|
|
|
fitting |
February 2, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
John Anderson
from Hampden, MA United States
|
|
This only got a four from ME because it doesn't look that same as the other one, so it's just a little funny. overall this is a good fitting, its cheap, fits on a Custom products ASA, so yeah very happy with this, will buy soon for my other guns!!!!
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Micro |
January 12, 2008 |
| Reviewer:
Jorge M. Zamudio Garcia
|
|
Well, if you are planning on going with a microline, this is the way to go, it looks kinda odd in my opinion, but it performs OK.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
