|
Quick Links
|
| |
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
 |
 |
 |
|
Best |
November 12, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
Logan Lewis
from fort worth, TX United States
|
|
best tank at this 100-150 dollar price range.
Was this review helpful to you? 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Great tank all around |
November 12, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
Anonymous person
from IL United States
|
|
Love this tank cant go wrong. the guy under me can quit crying now. my hydro was just fine.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
|
|
|
|
great tank for the price |
September 21, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
Chris
from Oxford, NC United States
|
|
great light little tank, only problem is as the person said below, has an old 9/07 date, but has a 5 yr hydro
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Old |
September 18, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
Decibel
from Boulder, CO United States
|
|
These tanks are on sale right now because it seams like they're sitting on a bunch of older tanks. I just got one it and it's date is 09'07. This tank is already 2 years old. Still good for the price. And definitely one of the lighter tanks I've used.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
68/4500 |
July 19, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
bernie temple
from gilmanton iw, NH United States
|
|
does this tank have a dot and a ct stamp or something like that?
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
